Monday 14 March 2011

The Folly of Relying on Agriculture And Mining

By Potpher Mbulo
DATE:  14-03-2011

This is for thought provocation in economics. Diversification of the economy away from the mines into agriculture is a foolish call. I say so because Zambian industry’s major problem is not unique. As a matter of fact, African’s industries at large might exhibit varying symptoms but have the same disease. The colonial rulers left an indelible filthy mark by way of the Ricardian Law of comparative advantage.

Ricardian Law of Comparative Advantage may be compared to absolute advantage. When one entity (be it a company or a country) is able to produce more efficiently than another entity it has an absolute advantage: that is, assuming equal inputs, the entity with an absolute advantage will have a greater output

Sadly enough post independent governments also over-emphasize development of agriculture and mining in Africa at the expense of industrial development even in the long run. This indeed has been the trend since the colonial era. Given Africa’s large endowment of land it is perceived that its comparative advantage is inevitably natural resources and so Africa should forget about manufacturing. But African leaders should realize that real return on investment is in adding value to raw materials to transform them into finished goods because at each value chain you can reap money though direct taxes of the profits. Failure to do this Africa will continue to wallow in poverty, being parasitic and dictated to at world prices. Zambia started well with import-substitution strategies to replace imports by manufacturing goods domestically essentially in order to meet domestic demand. But with the advent of Structured Adjustment Programmes (SAPs), intensive international competition and globalization forced the country to shift to export-oriented strategy which requires production of quality products for exports at low prices. Here is where countries are told to export raw materials in agriculture and mining.

There is a negative correlation between average income of citizens and percentage of people active in agriculture. Even so true is GDP per capita with percentage of Labor in Agriculture. See the data for the year 2006 below:
COUNTRY__________GDP Per Capita_________% OF LABOUR IN AGRICULTURE

USA______________$44,155.00_____________2%
France____________$36,546.72_____________3.2%
Japan_____________$34,022.94_____________3.8%
Brazil_____________$5,659.74_______________16.1%
Turkey____________$5,521.47_______________45.5%
Thailand__________$3,186.54________________55.7%
Zambia___________$919.50__________________68.6%  

I’m definitely sure that the above statistics can reflect the same trends even for mining.  So please let’s forget about agriculture and mining. Oops! Let’s concentrate on manufacturing i.e. value addition. LOL